Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 4381 - 4400 of 191,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2021, 8:31 pm by Florian Mueller
I translated that order.Both preliminary references have been assigned case numbers by the CJEU:C-44/21 for the preliminary injunction matter (Phoenix Contact v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 9:15 am by Matthew Nelson
  The case arose after a mortgage company foreclosed on a house nearly 15 years after the last payment had been made and despite the fact that the house had been sold to a new owner. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
   Only four judgments have been made public. [read post]
On 10 November 2021, the UK Supreme Court handed down the much anticipated judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, unanimously allowing Google’s appeal and reversing the decision of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:26 am
The Consumerist blog has posted the full text of the two remarkable Wells Fargo loan officer affidavits that describe in detail the lender's systematic targetting of Black homeowners to sell them high-price subprime mortgages, regardless of how good their credit might have been. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:28 am by traceydennis
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 “Where defendants had been convicted of criminal offences under a statute enacted by Parliament which was unenforceable owing to a failure by the United Kingdom Government, before its enactment, to comply with a Directive from the European Community, it was not incumbent upon the Court of Appeal to re-open their cases out of time unless their… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:45 am by Sarah Cramer, Olswang LLP
On 11 March 2015, the Supreme Court  heard Pendragon plc & Ors v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The top-side brief and supporting amicus briefs have been filed in a case we've been following, PPL Montana v. [read post]