Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 4381 - 4400 of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2011, 7:06 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaIf the 23-page complaint, The Authors Guild, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 10:32 am by Winiviere G. Sy
Pursuant to In re Merrick V., 122 Cal.App.4th 235 (2004), the court stated that ". . .leaving a 12 year old home alone posed a substantial risk of harm. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina issued an order addressing several motions in Allen v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 5:35 am
We have for too long been fighting an uphill battle to obtain justice for our clients. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In a case of “turnabout is fair play,” last Friday, a United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut considered, and disregarded, the USPTO’s reexamination analysis of the same prior art in Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm by Kiera Flynn
United States, which ran last month, we also plan to host symposia on the battle over the Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8, as well as the impact of recent class action and arbitration decisions at the Court. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:10 am by nflatow
I’ll never forget the scene outside the Supreme Court building the day of oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:27 pm by Mike Fucci
Dukes; Losing the Battle, But Winning the War: Negotiating a Favorable Conditional Certification "Class" Definition, Notice and Protocols during the notice period; Maximizing Discovery Tools for Decertification and Preventing Ultimate Certification; Opposing Rule 23 Class Certification of State Law Claims in Hybrid Cases Following a Ruling on Conditional Certification of the FLSA Collective Claim. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 9:26 am by Anthony Gaughan
" One part of the interview that particularly caught my eye is Driver's revisionist account of Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:07 am by Joanna Herzik
Opinions and statements expressed in these profiles are those of their subjects - not the State Bar of Texas. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]