Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 3:52 pm
On March 18, 2014, the panel of Probate Judges discussed the current state of Probate Court in Los Angeles County and addressed questions and concerns submitted by members of the Beverly Hills Bar Association. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:34 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlAlabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
More Blog Posts: State Supreme Court Reverses Plaintiff’s Award for Punitive Damages, Maryland Car Accident Attorney Blog, published October 7, 2015. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm
Judge Thomas was found not guilty of paddling and sex abuse allegations but an Alabama State Bar disciplinary board nevertheless disbarred Thomas twice “after finding that he paddled and spanked criminal defendants on his court docket in “sexually motivated assaults,” according to the board’s order. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:44 am
" In particular, he notes that of seven such lateral moves since 1980, five were moves to the California state judiciary, noting that California is "near the very top of the professionalism score measure. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 7:08 am
In seven other states — California, Arkansas, Delaware, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio and South Dakota — almost all executions are being stayed as courts grapple with lawsuits asserting that lethal injection procedures violate the constitutional bar on cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:50 am
The dissenters would have held that such an action is barred. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:11 am
Applying the Act in a manner consistent with provisions in express trusts, the anti-anticipation clause bars any attempt to pay or commit for payment benefits before they become due. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 2:27 pm
On this point, the Court stated: “Plaintiff proffers no authority for the proposition that the Court may excise one particular aspect of an integrated strategy game and evaluate that aspect in isolation. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
California, 283 U.S. 359, 368-70 (1931), from CAAF’s own opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:27 am
Each of the three plaintiffs also asserted state statutory claims, under various Texas, California and Massachusetts statutory provisions. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 11:41 am
”) In September 2018, the CFPB filed a lawsuit against the defendants in a California federal district court in which it alleged that defendants made loans disguised as asset purchases that violated state usury and licensing laws. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Himmelreich is when a court’s dismissal of an inmate’s Federal Tort Claims Act bars a parallel Bivens claim. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:10 am
State In June 2011, the defendant and a friend were drinking together in a bar. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 9:14 am
As EFF helped establish in the California Supreme Court’s Intel v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 1:13 am
On the merits, the district court examined the California Supreme Court’s rationale in McGill. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 9:26 am
LEXIS 2487 (CA App., April 8, 2013), a California state appellate court rejected free exercise and equal protection challenges to a risk factor analysis for sex offenders used by the probation department which treated as added risk the fact that an individual had not lived with a lover for at least 2 years. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:30 am
“Only the Supreme Court can finally resolve these issues, and I hope it will,” she wrote.In urging the Supreme Court to hear the case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:47 am
” Plaintiffs have begun filing data privacy class action lawsuits based on these wiretap statutes in federal and state courts nationwide — most notably in the states of California, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Florida and Illinois — by asserting that these laws extend to how businesses access internet communications. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:00 am
” Plaintiffs have begun filing data privacy class action lawsuits based on these wiretap statutes in federal and state courts nationwide — most notably in the states of California, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Florida and Illinois — by asserting that these laws extend to how businesses access internet communications. [read post]
