Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 4,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
Vallee rendered judgment in Nakhuda v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm
United States, and giving defendants access to law enforcement reports in Jencks v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
” Aaradhya Bachchan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge) US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 5:14 am
PanamaSilva v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
She works with each justice’s chambers on the syllabus for opinions. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 5:26 pm
As decided in Carter v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm
AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:31 am
In Internet Law, I teach the decade-old Ticketmaster v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:02 am
Ius de non evocando As the court in Pinochet notes with respect to crimes against the law of nations, there is a duty incumbent upon any potential forum state to defer to the proceedings of an international court or a court in a state which would otherwise have jurisdiction.[7] “Without question, the intervening entity or state must exercise great caution before concluding that intervention is necessary… …the emphasis must remain on… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
They happened on the floors of legislative chambers, and in the newspapers, campaign halls, and meeting rooms of the nation. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
Case T 647/11 Asos plc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Roger Maier, a decision of the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) this past Tuesday, is just one piece in a rather larger jigsaw of interlocking litigation between two assertive brand owners. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
The power of a Community collective mark, when contrasted with a protected geographical indication, was put to the test on 2 October, in Cases T-624/13 (noted here), T-625/13, 626/13 and 627/13 The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Delta Lingerie Intervening, when the Eighth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union gave its decision on a series of separate Community trade mark oppositions relating to very… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, a General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) decision going back to 7 July, is one of those decisions that has been sitting in this Kat's in-tray for far too long. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:30 am
" "Roe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
One such 'something' is Case C‑202/12, Innoweb BV v Wegener ICT Media BV, Wegener Mediaventions BV, a ruling from the Fifth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) last Thursday, following a request for a preliminary ruling by the Gerechtshof te ‘s‑Gravenhage (The Hague Regional Court, The Netherlands).Through its Auto Track website www.autotrack.nl, Dutch company Wegener provided access to an online collection of advertisements for… [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:08 am
One such 'something' is Case C‑202/12, Innoweb BV v Wegener ICT Media BV, Wegener Mediaventions BV, a ruling from the Fifth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) last Thursday, following a request for a preliminary ruling by the Gerechtshof te ‘s‑Gravenhage (The Hague Regional Court [amended text: of Appeal], The Netherlands).Through its Auto Track website www.autotrack.nl, Dutch company Wegener provided access to an online… [read post]
