Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 4381 - 4400 of 28,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
The CCA granted Stringer's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this Tarrant County possession of child pornography case on the following issue:Whether the Court of Appeals erred in deciding that because the Appellant filed an application for probation, and relied upon the positive information in the PSI to urge the trial court to consider probation, he forfeited or is estopped from asserting his Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause objection to testimonial… [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 11:25 am
Threlkel, an 18-page opinion, Judge Barnes writes:Rita Quinn appeals the trial court's order on her petition for modification of child support and for payment of college expenses from her ex-husband, Robert Threlkel, for their child, Elaine Threlkel. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 12:23 am by Pamela Fasick
Penal Code Section 11172 Liability for False or Reckless Reports of Child Abuse Applies Only to Third Parties and Not to the Alleged VictimChabak v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:37 am by Gerard Magliocca
 Advocates of the ordinance consider the practice a form of child abuse. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Additionally, the court should refrain from promising the child any particular outcome in the case.In evaluating whether visitation with a grandparent is in a child’s best interests, the most significant consideration is the nature and quality of the relationship between the grandparent and the childIn Matter of Marilyn Y. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:39 am by Joel R. Brandes
There is no bright line rule for an age at which the Court should consider a child sufficiently mature. [read post]