Search for: "DANIEL v. STATE" Results 4381 - 4400 of 4,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm by Macy Berryman
In a working paper, Daniel J. [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:30 am
Panama already exports most of its goods to the United States duty-free under our trade preference programs. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  Aside from the difficulties that Google and other internet intermediaries are having in determining what is inaccurate, out of date and irrelevant, the reported English cases since Costeja, most notably Daniel Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) and Max Mosley v Google Inc and Google Limited ([2015 ] EWHC 59 (QB)) have highlighted a very significant tension between data protection law and the law of defamation and other content laws (including Article 8… [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:29 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Brown, which concerns whether Maryland may ban semiautomatic rifles that are in common use for lawful purposes, and Ocean State Tactical v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:50 am by Adrian Lurssen
"- NY Lawyers Allowed to Friend Adversaries on Facebook (by Daniel Clement):"New ethical opinions by the New York State Bar Association and the New York City Bar Association permit lawyers to scour the public pages Facebook, Twitter and other social networks for incriminating evidence to be used against an opposing party in a lawsuit... [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:12 am by Chester Brown
There is much to comment on from the various case studies, and although Professor Cheng claims to take a politically moderate view (p. 16), some will have their eyebrows raised by, or take exception to, his extensive criticism of the ICJ’s judgment in the Nicaragua case (pp. 141-162); the suggestion that the award of the NAFTA tribunal in Loewen v United States is in part defensible as it “reduc[ed] the risk that the United States would withdraw from… [read post]