Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 4381 - 4400 of 8,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2016, 12:48 pm by Michael Walsh
Eventually, one defendant moved to dismiss the matter for violating the 5-year deadline. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 6:20 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
But how does that help the victims, whose lives have been irreparably affected? [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
  The fourth took the best part of 20 weeks to be determined. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 11:44 am
Does not unanimously find at least one aggravating factor, the defendant is ineligible for a sentence of death. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Apple claims that it cannot unlock its newer iPhones for law enforcement (such as the iPhone 5c), even when presented with a warrant, because its phones are now engineered in such a way that Apple does not hold the decryption key. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:15 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It deserves more serious attention than it's likely to get, not because it breaks much new ground, but because the approach the President is laying out is quite reasonable whether or not one believes fervently—as the President does—that Guantanamo should close or believes—as I do—that the Guantanamo question per se is deeply unimportant. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Securities Act of 1933 does not permit the SEC to bring an enforcement action on behalf of an individual investor; however, individual investors are permitted to bring civil actions under several of its sections as noted below:   ■ Section 5 and Section 12(a)(1) allow purchasers (investors) to sue issuers for offering or selling a non-exempt security without registering it. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
 The defendant was awarded 60% of its overall costs, with two specific reductions. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
However, on August 30, 2007, after exhausting the $1 million primary policy limit and $480,395 of the $20 million excess policy, St. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  This cheat sheet deals only with individual states – no issues of nationwide statutory service of process.To help our readers, we note in each case if it is: (1) a prescription medical product liability case; (2) a product liability case not involving a prescription medical product; or (3) it’s not a product liability case at all. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:48 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
In 2016, the cap is $2.20 million, for acts of malpractice that occurred between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 (Va. [read post]