Search for: "Doe v. Brown" Results 4381 - 4400 of 5,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 3:21 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Invoking al-Adahi, he stated: That means that there are powerful reasons for the government to rely on our opinion in Al-Adahi v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:03 am by Josh Blackman
Unfortunately, we still do not have an opinion from Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
  I never expected that to be the moment when he proved his mettle for a seat on the New York Court of Appeals.In Groninger v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
EPA in 1980, and the Supreme Court reaffirmed this interpretation of the Act in Whitman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Example: orange flavored soda doesn’t need to be orange; brown/purple would still taste like orange soda. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:32 am by Bexis
  Another FDA power grab failed in the face of decades of non-use of purported agency authority in FDA v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
Reading the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
Some details can be found in the judgments of Lord Dyson at paragraphs 7-11 and Lord Brown at paragraphs 127-131. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:42 am by Kara OBrien
Williams, dated April 20, 2011 (the “April 20 Letter”), the FPPC stated that the law does not apply retroactively to contracts that an investment adviser had with a California state pension plan before the law took effect on January 1, 2011. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm
Commissioner of Social Security New York Social Security Ruling Underscores Importance of Treating Physician Testimony: Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am by Adam Chandler
Continuing to assess with the implications of last week’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Alito reassured proponents of strict gun control regimes that despite their “doomsday proclamations, incorporation [of the Second Amendment] does not imperil every law regulating fire? [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
The two big decisions, though, were Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
Lord Phillips reiterated, as [58], that “the HRA does not have retroactive effect”, also that its interpretation ought to mirror that of the Convention. [read post]