Search for: "German v. German" Results 4381 - 4400 of 5,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2010, 5:39 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Tereshko has issued yet another Post-Koken decision.On July 14, 2010, Judge Tereshko issued an Order, without Opinion, in the case of Pippett v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Marion V., who teaches German and Geography, refuses to say if she is actually afraid of rabbits. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:15 pm
The complaining owners of the tournament—the German and Qatar Tennis Federations—failed to establish a valid relevant market definition affected by the alleged conduct. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:51 am by Erin Miller
In response to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
Hot off the presses and straight from the source, I have an advanced copy of the International Court of Justice preliminary ruling concerning Italy’s counterclaims in the Jurisdiction Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:04 am by Jen Kreder
  In the most recent Nazi-looted art appeal of Grosz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:18 am by INFORRM
  The coverage appeared in 2004, but in 2005 the German courts granted the actor’s application for order banning re-publication of any information about the entire issue, and banned the use of photographs. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:38 am by Gilles Cuniberti
It should be remembered that in the famous case of Princess Caroline of Hanover v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
Becton, Dickinson is pending en banc: Advanced Magnetic Closures v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:47 pm by Kelly
Cefetra (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) (IP Watch) (EPLAW) Germany : German parliament members seek limited patent terms in EU-India FTA (IP Watch) Netherlands: Sufficiency of disclosure finally on the Dutch radar : Novozymes v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the impugned decision of the ED was insufficiently reasoned.Thus the [applicant] requests reimbursement of the appeal fee and, for all other matters, withdraws the appeal.Unsurprisingly, the Board rejects this request:** Translation from the German **[V] R 67, first sentence, EPC 1973 reads as follows:The reimbursement of appeal fees shall be ordered in the event of interlocutory revision or where the Board of appeal deems an appeal to be allowable, if such reimbursement… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 10:02 am by David Post
[The 1974 final, Holland v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:19 am by Andres
Last week the excellent Internet Cases blog reported on an new court case involving Creative Commons licences: GateHouse Media, Inc. v. [read post]