Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 6,574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 3:20 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am
On November 8, 2011, more than three years after granting review, the California Supreme Court heard oral argument in Brinker v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 4:30 am
A recent decision by the Kansas Supreme Court in Superior Boiler Works, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:56 am
Courts seem to take idea of aesthetic progress for granted. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
Justice Thomas argues there that the Court should have granted review to reconsider its Establishment jurisprudence, in particular the "endorsement test" that has served as a gloss for some years now on the "Lemon test. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:20 pm
In 1968 the Supreme Court ruled in Bruton v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
Superior Court(1972) 23 CA 3d 427,433 (pdf) Insurers Clark v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
Superior Court(1972) 23 CA 3d 427,433 (pdf) Insurers Clark v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:42 pm
(Edna Valley Watch v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:16 pm
Just two months later, on October 22, 2008, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
As far as I know, the decision in Gold is the first instance in which a court granted a straight buyout remedy for an LLC member without there being a basis for dissolution. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
” A procedural reminder: this appeal, which Judge Beaty granted despite the only on-point precedent coming from the Middle District of Alabama, involves the City’s attempt to have the case dismissed before any discovery occurs. ---------------- One reason, perhaps, for Durham’s aggressive attempt to overturn Judge Beaty’s decision came last week, when the Supreme Court considered a grand jury immunity case, Rehberg v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
Borst v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
Were things any different in that respect under Chief Justice Vinson, and if so, do you have any views about whether either mode of decision-making is superior to the other? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Most cases are, by default, in the Superior Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Those were some of the questions raised by State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
V. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:44 am
Aladdin Capital Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
