Search for: "High v State" Results 4381 - 4400 of 35,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm by Kevin Kaufman
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am by ASAD KHAN
Originally posted here About the author: Asad Ali Khan is BA, MSc, MA, LLB (Hons), BVC, LLM, Barrister-at-Law (Middle Temple), Advocate High Courts Pakistan. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
In addition to the high costs of detention, damages of £13.8 million were paid to 573 claimants between 2012-2015. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:24 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Ganias v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:19 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Weaver v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:24 am by Jack Goldsmith
Two pieces in the news worth noting on the issue of secrecy v. transparency in the U.S. intelligence world. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 5:07 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States Case: Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:55 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Cleobury, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 17 (24 January 2012) Arshad, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 18 (24 January 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Weddall v Barchester Healthcare Ltd (Company No.02792285) [2012] EWCA Civ 25 (24 January 2012) West Tankers Inc v Allianz SPA & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 27 (24 January 2012) MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 7 (24 January 2012) High Court… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:29 am by sally
Supreme Court HM Treasury v Ahmed & Ors [2010] UKSC 5 (04 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Hancox & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 102 (04 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perinpanathan, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 40 (04 February 2010) The Port of London Authority v Ashmore [2010] EWCA Civ 30 (04 February 2010) Republic of Argentina v NML Capital Ltd… [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am by Nabiha Syed
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:20 pm
  It definitely stuck out to me.Because it's absolutely brilliant.It's about something (1) that's incredibly complicated, and (2) about which I know fairly well -- the preclusive effect of a federal judgment on subsequent state court litigation, particularly when (as here) the federal court either cannot or declines to exercise jurisdiction over part of the claim (e.g., supplemental state law claims). [read post]