Search for: "House v. House"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 41,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
A similar bill was introduced in the House of Representatives about six months ago. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:53 am
Helena Partnerships Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (Attorney General intervening): [2012] EWCA Civ 569; [2012] WLR (D) 142 “The provision of housing accommodation was, and could only be, a charitable purpose if it was justified as charitable in respect of the direct benefit provided. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:46 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
There is an interesting post by David Thomas on the Anthony Gold ‘Housing and Public Law’ blog about a settled Judicial Review that highlights this issue.The challenge was to the suitability of temporary accommodation provided as interim accommodation and then provided after acceptance of the full housing duty, so under both s.188 and s.93 Housing Act 1996. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
There is an interesting post by David Thomas on the Anthony Gold ‘Housing and Public Law’ blog about a settled Judicial Review that highlights this issue.The challenge was to the suitability of temporary accommodation provided as interim accommodation and then provided after acceptance of the full housing duty, so under both s.188 and s.93 Housing Act 1996. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:04 am
After Lingle v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:54 am
This was the main question considered by the High Court in Delaney v Chen although some other points of interest were discussed. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:54 am
This was the main question considered by the High Court in Delaney v Chen although some other points of interest were discussed. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
Da Costa v Pinter Bromley County Court April 2008 With thanks to the November Legal Action housing updates. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:03 pm
They were a consequence of this court’s earlier decision in Pelullo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:03 pm
They were a consequence of this court’s earlier decision in Pelullo v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:02 am
“”Administrative State Is THE Leading Threat to Civil Liberties of Our Era'”: Nick Gillespie interview with Philip Hamburger at Reason; Beyond the deference debates: White House Counsel Don McGahn speaks on Chenery I v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:23 pm
by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:08 am
The Supreme Court has published its decision in the case of AXA General Insurance Limited and others v The Lord Advocate and Others [2011] UKSC 46 in which AXA and other insurers (the Insurers) appealed against the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session regarding the legality of the Damages (Asbestos-Related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 (the 2009 Act) (please see our previous blog here for further information on that decision).The 2009 Act was passed to reverse the… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:38 pm
From Black v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 7:59 am
Arlen House East Condo. v. [read post]
