Search for: "In Re T."
Results 4381 - 4400
of 220,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2009, 5:55 am
The IRS hasn't exactly announced it, but they're cracking down on Small Business to collect revenue this year. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:08 am
Here’s the intro from this Richards Layton memo: In In re Appraisal of Dell Inc., C.A. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 10:44 pm
Yes, but conceding that you're boring doesn't make you more competent, inspiring people is part of the President's work, and the capacity to deliver a fine oration doesn't entail some corresponding incapacity. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:23 am
Our friends over at All About Estates make a good point in this blog post - you have to re-examine your estate plan from time to time. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
If you feel like your thoughts and insights aren’t valued at work, you’re not alone — 59.5% of workers report that they don’t think their organizations don’t care about their opinions, according to a survey conducted by the Greater Baltimore Committee and Towson University that aimed to understand the feelings of women in the workplace ... [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:41 am
They're paying $8.4 billion a year in sales taxes and $1.2 billion in income taxes. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:17 am
Don’t worry, be happy — unless you’re an employee. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
So, if you're going to play it at work. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:14 pm
Only your family is crying out that you're missing. via www.thedailybeast.com [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:37 am
The reason for the refusal is that we're all human - some seniors don't want to admit their growing frailties; others think that accepting care is the start of the slippery slope [read post]
21 May 2017, 3:15 am
In re AT&T Intellectual Prop. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 6:41 am
Or, if you're staying home, that you're warm and cozy. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
That the board required a "clear and unambiguous declaration of intent that an appeal is filed" was arbitrary and did not find any basis in the relevant legal provisions.It followed from decision T 620/13, that the request under Rule 99(1)(c) EPC could be implicit.Furthermore, the present case was similar to the one underlying decision T 925/91.Decision J 19/90 was correct under the legal framework of the EPC 1973 but was no longer applicable since the entry into force of… [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:00 am
Even though you're a non-profit, the commercial marketing purpose would likely weigh against a fair use argument. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
You can’t consider yourself a responsible member of the community if you’re not taking steps to conserve resources. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 2:32 am
Don't I have a right to not submit it through Turnitin? [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
This means that, contrary to the suggestion of the [patent proprietors], the board’s decision concerning A 123(2) is not res judicata and was open to challenge, for example by an opponent citing A 100(c) in the notice of opposition; this would be comparable to the situations arising in T 1099/06 and T 167/93. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:45 pm
But I don’t think you really love giving boys in general blow jobs without any feeling to someone you’re not close to. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
I just can't believe it's been nearly 2 months since I wrote my last post.... the longest gap in 8 years. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:46 pm
Please don’t include any personal information in your submission…” [read post]
