Search for: "In re Means"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 89,826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
"Also good (but not quite as legal-focused): Georgina Adam in The Art Newspaper: 2015's biggest art market developments and what they mean. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:43 pm
The Australian Law Reform Commission has published an article on User-friendly legislation: Why we need it, and how to achieve it:"In our view, the design, drafting, and publication of legislation in Australia needs a fundamental re-think based on ‘user-experience’. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
After the father failed to comply, on November 4, 2021, the judge dismissed his petition, “without prejudice” – meaning he could later re-file.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, had no issue with the dismissal, particularly given its “without prejudice” marking. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:09 am
"Of course, this just means that folks have added plans to their carts, the real numbers will be when (if?) [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:53 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that policy objective means that California's statute that requires consumers to be warned about things that may cause cancer (via warning labels) is preempted vis-a-vis breakfast cereals in which such cancer-causing chemicals are created by baking, frying, or roasting such grains.Which is a shorthand way of saying that since telling the people the truth may cause them to react in ways we think are bad for them, we'll make sure… [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 3:06 pm
I'm sure they mean well in all cases, and do good in some. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 3:48 pm
At least they're trying to stay consistent. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 11:20 am
It's not paradoxical once you're familiar with a lot of things, which I, as an old person am. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:12 am
Or whatever they're called these days. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 8:45 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit heard oral argument in Auribundo's appeal of the district court's decision in favor of plaintiff Merck, in a case captioned In re Sugammadex (alternatively, Aurobindo v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 4:31 pm
According to the latest Job Optimism report by consulting firm Robert Half, what percentage of legal professionals say they’re satisfied in their current job? [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:46 pm
Res. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
Yes, the Court said: regardless of whether it could order the President to re-appoint Mr. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:01 am
Say you’re a widow. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:34 am
"That means you're living. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
In In re Syncor ERISA Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
It might mean you’re not spending Christmas with your parents so that the children can spend Hanukkah with their mom’s family. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:43 am
If you’re not happy with whatever outcome happens in the General District Court, you have the absolute right to appeal that decision for a trial de novo, which means a new trial, in the Circuit Court. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:48 pm
Even though you don't mean to do something bad, but something bad still happens, you need to be held accountable. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
(It's awfully short, and we don't really understand what it means anyway, so we can't condense it further.) [read post]