Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 4381 - 4400 of 6,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 5:46 am by Rob Robinson
- http://t.co/ZK2wo2M (Ericka Chickowski) Cloudy Content - http://t.co/tCp9Tt3 (Robert Boeri) Cut the Law Firms, Keep the Lawyers - http://t.co/1lKFn3f (Vanessa O’Connell) Email is Still Most Popular - http://t.co/FNgxHkz (Jeff Orloff) Facebook Stalks Mobile Phone Numbers - http://t.co/YetVNXX (Kim Davis) Get Your Social Media Under Control! [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Larry Tribe Guest
Davis) would of course be a decisive precedent for the constitutionality of a system under which Congress cre [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Anthony Fairclough, Matrix Law
It was not published until 1832, however, because in response to the riot, the Government considerably tightened censorship and sedition laws . . . ) Anita Davies is away. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:14 am by SHG
We review questions of law de novo. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  In Bryant, you’ll recall (and if you don’t you can read about it here), the Court expanded upon the “primary purpose” test for determining whether a statement is testimonial, which the Court had earlier established in Davis v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:06 am
Davis argued that “because the majority of the duties that she performed as school psychologist consisted of the counseling and other related duties of the newly created elementary counselor position, the two positions are similar within the meaning of Education Law Section 2510. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
Davies, Luke Glanville.Leiden Boston : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011.KZ4080 .R47 2011 International Law International law and diplomacy / Dr. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Because the arbitral findings establish as a matter of law that defendants were not the cause of plaintiff's losses, the motion court properly dismissed plaintiff's complaint (see Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 43 AD3d 680, 682 [2007], affd 11 NY3d 195 [2008]). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:07 am by WSLL
Davis, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): Diane M. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:25 am by admin
After brushing up on some case law I came across Zadvydas v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:59 am by Jenna Greene
" Weil Gotshal & Manges partner Mark Davis wrote that Luckern's "defining characteristic has always been respect--respect for the litigants appearing before him, respect for the investigative process entrusted to the commission, and respect for the law. [read post]