Search for: "Level v. State" Results 4381 - 4400 of 29,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
EMI’s state unfair competition claim remains. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am by INFORRM
On 2 May 1996, the applicant put out a press release stating that its next issue would include a letter from the Earth Liberation Front (“ELF”) which claimed responsibility for a bomb attack on 16 April 1996. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 5:02 am by Russ Bensing
  Ten years later, in State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
While prior committee hearings and state level efforts to challenge the inclusion of ESG information into the investment process had focused on the large asset managers and Department of Labor ESG regulations, the July hearings shifted the focus onto the shareholder proposal process regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under Rule 14a-8, and on the support for shareholder proposals by proxy advisors, passive investors and registered investment… [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
While prior committee hearings and state level efforts to challenge the inclusion of ESG information into the investment process had focused on the large asset managers and Department of Labor ESG regulations, the July hearings shifted the focus onto the shareholder proposal process regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under Rule 14a-8, and on the support for shareholder proposals by proxy advisors, passive investors and registered investment… [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They need a champion and real hope at the federal level, because so many states are failing them.As I listened, it seemed to me that this issue is tailor-made for you, and the timing is right. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Conversely, where the Court has found no violation of Article 10 – as in the case of Peruzzi v Italy which concerned the defamation of a judge to his colleagues – the Court reiterates that criminal defamation falls within the margin of appreciation allowed to Contracting States. [read post]