Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 4381 - 4400 of 19,981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2014, 4:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Defendants’ aggregate liability was tied to a concrete, objective set of facts—total sales—“that will remain the same no matter how many claims are submitted. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:56 pm
  And under Mattco Forge and other cases, the good faith determination is a matter left to the trial court's discretion. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
” If, contra the panel, it was also clear that CIDT did, as well, then it wouldn’t matter whether Padilla was tortured or was instead “only” subjected to CIDT. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
[…] [Inquiry 2] [T]he analysis turns to the judicial exceptions to subject-matter eligibility. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:26 am by Jonathan Holbrook
For example, Rule 1101(b) states that the rules of evidence do not apply to probable cause hearings, but G.S. 15A-611 independently directs that the state must make its showing of probable cause through the use of “nonhearsay evidence, or by evidence that satisfies an exception to the hearsay rule,” with limited exceptions allowed for matters such as examination and testing reports, or hearsay offered to prove issues of value, ownership, possession, or consent. [read post]
14 May 2011, 5:29 am by J
Although it isn't entirely clear, it seems that Southwark paid their contractors in stage payments between 2005 and 2007. [read post]
14 May 2011, 5:29 am by J
Although it isn't entirely clear, it seems that Southwark paid their contractors in stage payments between 2005 and 2007. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Grade: B Super Bowl X 1975 Bland and boring. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:50 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
For a hard core materialist, it won’t matter how believable an “experience” may be–its not real unless it can be scientifically verified (though, even scientists are moving away from the constraints of falsification, a story for another day). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:17 pm by Ira Meislik
Yes, my experience has been that no matter what I do, it will be wrong. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
App. 2011) held that [B]oth medical necessity and a causal connection between the compensable injury and the requested treatment must exist. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:24 am by SJM
The tenancy pre-dated the changes to the 1985 Housing Act brought in by the Localism Act 2011 on 1/4/2012, which meant that because Ms T and Mr D were an unmarried couple, s.87(b) applied to Ms T's application. [read post]