Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 13,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
That’s not to say that the court couldn’t have authorized service of process on the lawyer pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3), but I think the court was wrong to say that as a general matter service on the lawyer is sufficient to effect service on the client. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:14 pm
Next up: C Is For Commuting Expenses This should be a short post: you cannot deduct the costs of getting to and from work, no matter if you take a bus, trolley, subway, taxi, or drive your own car. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
DJ Desai (very experienced in housing matters) held for Ms T. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:09 am
Solutia, 385 F. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm
Wyeth, 621 F. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Even if as a matter of principle there ought to be such liability, we don’t have 100 years of it. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
Thus, I don’t foresee any social media evidence being introduced into his trial. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
Thus, I don’t foresee any social media evidence being introduced into his trial. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important case we’ve been following involving CEQA’s definition of a “project” on the afternoon of June 4, 2019, and took the matter under submission. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:31 am
Each county has its own court system for resolving divorce and other family law matters. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued A&F on Ms. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Not surprisingly, we don't think so. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
Department of Labor, 992 F.2d 474, 478-79 (3d Cir. 1993). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:43 pm
Don’t ask.) [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm
In Airborne Express the Board explained that, “[t]he essential element in [the joint-employer] analysis is whether a putative joint employer’s control over employment matters is direct and immediate. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
There isn't any. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:10 am
Well, we’d like to believe that it means a plaintiff’s lawyer can’t create a common legal question worthy of class certification just by claiming that the putative class members fall on the production side of the administrative/production dichotomy, or by claiming that they do not exercise discretion on matters of substantial importance or significance simply because they do not possess policy-making authority. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
Hospira, Inc., the Eleventh Circuit extended the POM Wonderful rule to Lanham Act claims concerning drug labels. 1 F.4th 1374, 1380–81 (11th Cir. 2021). [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:08 am
The alleged marketing was broadly based and “essentially ubiquitous”; this wasn’t a claim where the date was necessary to identify a single putatively offending ad.Gerber also invoked In re GNC Corp., 789 F.3d 505 (4th Cir. 2015) [boo!] [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm
Wood, 211 F.3d 480, 485-86 (9th Cir.) [read post]
