Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 4381 - 4400 of 13,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
It is not necessarily a person who uniformly despises all females, no matter the circumstances. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm by Marty Lederman
  “[T]he District Court in exercising its equity powers may command persons properly before it to cease or perform acts outside its territorial jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In affirming the trial court’s judgment in full, the Court of Appeal soundly rejected all of RCAs arguments, ruling as follows: As a matter of law, the RFEIR did not lack the “accurate, stable and finite project description” encompassing the “whole of [the] action” that is required by CEQA. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
"In line with T 848/93 (GL (2017), F-IV, 4.13), the BoA came to the conclusion that the stated purpose of the process "to fuel an IGCC" is not to be interpreted as a mere suitability of the process for that stated purpose but rather as functional feature of the process. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
The decisions T 0848/93 and T 0304/08 are based on different facts and cannot be regarded as divergent decisions.VII. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 7:26 pm by Jamie Markham
It doesn’t matter which prior conviction you count, because they all count the same. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Thompson, 947 F.2d 666, 676 (3d Cir. 1991) (so holding as a First Amendment matter, but concluding that Pennsylvan [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Tax returns that didn’t report full-year MEC or an exemption, or pay an penalty, are referred to as “silent returns”. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Tax returns that didn’t report full-year MEC or an exemption, or pay an penalty, are referred to as “silent returns”. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:21 am by Eugene Volokh
II, f. 27b (1310) (explaining that it was "the law of the land" that "no one [could] be taken by surprise" by having to "answer in court for what [one] has not been warned to answer"). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:22 am
That's more complicated than you hoped, isn't it? [read post]