Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 4381 - 4400 of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2007, 2:57 am
  The statutes may have only partly recognized rights or partly extended Congress's powers. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The SEC was authorized by Congress to prescribe rules to regulate the use of proxies "as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If you think you can get safe harbors, Congress will be the entity to do that after Actavis. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (Canadian Trademark Blog), Liberals settle Green Shift trade mark dispute: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (IPblog.ca), CBC Radio documentary ‘Who owns ideas? [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In the current environment, the profit maximizing corporation may choose to stay away, or even quietly reduce involvement with Israel, caving in to global boycotts without admitting that it is doing so.[6] Congress has prohibited boycotts,[7] and conservatives have urged that Congress do so even more strongly.[8] Congress, however, cannot mandate that corporations do business with Israel or prevent them from pulling out “for other reasons. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:52 am by Frank Pasquale
When Congress afforded retroactive to the telecoms for warrantless wiretapping, it should have at least acknowledged the cost of its actions, both to individuals and to the rule of law as a whole. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Meridian Medical Technologies (EPLAW) Monday miscellany: Schütz (UK) Limited v Werit UK Limited, Protechna SA; Superman’ logo drug dealer jailed (IPKat) Not the 2012 Olympics: Willie and Kate to wed (IPKat) UK government gets acid response from ACID (Class 99) United States US General USCC 2010 Report released (IP Dragon) USPTO issues performance and accountability report for Fiscal Year 2010 (TTABlog) US Patent Reform Patent Reform in the lame duck congress? [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
I put that in quotation marks because the government treats the forgiven debt like the bonus you wish you got but never did. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
I put that in quotation marks because the government treats the forgiven debt like the bonus you wish you got but never did. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Part I – Spicy IP), India: Discussion of grant of Indian patents to Cipla for Fosamax derivative and Nexium derivative: (Spicy IP), India: Draft National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority Bill: (Spicy IP), Ivory Coast: Ivorians increasingly choose fake medicines on price: (Afro-IP), Mexico: New Mexican medicaments approvals regime: an early report: (IP tango), UK: Leave to appeal refused in trade mark infringement proceedings between Eli Lilly and 8PM Chemist concerning… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:32 am by Vincent LoTempio
Leahy stated, “When Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and I started this process several Congresses ago, along with Congress members  John Conyers Jr. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:56 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
I’m in the Windy City today and had the opportunity to see the 1897 statue of General John Alexander Logan. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:50 pm by WIMS
      Under current law, the President must submit his five-year plan to Congress for a mandatory 60-day review. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:40 pm
"I'm afraid that Canada has kind of lost the plot a plot a little bit this year and hence its move downwards,'' Davies told the Canadian Press in comments about Canada.He cites the CIA's accessing the banking records of Canadians through the SWIFT banking information system, the Canadian no-fly list, and the Toronto Transit Commission's installation of security cameras as examples of the erosion of privacy rights. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:17 am by Jeff Foust
Chicago: That city’s outsider bid for an orbiter got support last week in a letter to Bolden by the state’s two senators, Richard Durbin (D) and Mark Kirk (R). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
As the Federal Circuit pointed out, there is no clear precedent that disparaging marks are entitled to common law trademark protection. [read post]