Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4381 - 4400
of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2024, 6:34 am
Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
In its absence, state law could impose legal duties that would conflict directly with federal regulatory mandates.Id. at 870-71 (citations and quotation marks omitted).These decisions were in turn applied to the FDCA by a unanimous court in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:43 am
AC34519 - State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Lis v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:43 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Appleby, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 926 (29 April 2010) Jones, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 925 (29 April 2010) Kazantzis, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 712 (16 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RW v SW [2010] EWCA Civ 457 (29 April 2010) Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010) McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) Parker v Secretary of State for… [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
The consensus view is that obligations to transfer the ownership of a trade mark do not fall within the scope of the exclusive jurisdiction of Article 22(4) Brussels I (see also Case 288/82 - Duijnstee v Goderbauer). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
ArcSoft, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
S. 446, 452 (2019) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Dutra Group v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:42 am
Urban Outfitters Inc. et al (Case number 1:12-cv-00195).Professor Ewelukwa concluded by stating that there are several questions which Africans and Nigerians must ask viz: What are the IP needs and expectations of holders of traditional knowledge/cultural property? [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
" Snyder's Lance, Inc. and Princeton Vanguard, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:05 am
(Mark Graber, Sanford Levinson, Mark Tushnet, eds., Oxford University Press, 2018 Forthcoming)).Marie T. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:54 am
WHB Licensing, LP v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:18 am
www.bublicklaw.com In the case of Bakes v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
Vervaele, Criminal Investigation and Prosecution by a European Public Prosecutor's Office in the EU John Hagan, Ron Levi, & Sara Dezalay, Prosecutorial Practice and Strategic Statements: Justifying International Prosecutions Victor Peskin, Virtual Trials Revisited: The Shifting Politics of State Cooperation from the UN Ad Hoc Tribunals to the International Criminal Court Anne Lise Kjær & Jakob v. [read post]
