Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4381 - 4400
of 21,686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
At The Washington Free Beacon, Kevin Daley reports that Monday’s decision in Ramos v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am
It tried a similar approach in Canada in what is by now quite a well-known case, Google v Equustek. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
COVID-19 has again exposed the power of the space, which marks the confines of the legalization of politics, the judicialization of political contests around fundamental issues of morals, ethics, social norms, and international relations. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm
Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am
First, while some of the dissent is a reiteration of complaints Gorsuch raised in his dissent two years ago in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
(State of New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
S. 446, 457 (2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
Professor Rick Hasen has some thoughts on RNC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:12 am
Webster v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:12 am
S. 406, 416 (2007) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are… [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
Considering that the marks used by the Defendant are identical to the AUDI Trademarks, initial-interest confusion is likely. * Dish Network LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:29 pm
VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:06 pm
Instead of, or in addition to, election-specific statutes, several states more broadly allow the governor to suspend state laws or statutory deadlines during declared states of emergency when necessary to protect human life. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:23 am
" Large Jury Award Vacated Because of Faulty Instruction on Bicyclist Duties In Mariano Simota Bailey v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Beyond the utility of virtual hearings as short term emergency measures, there is reason to believe that this moment may well mark the start of a shift toward increased use of virtual hearings in the longer term. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 2:22 pm
In that case, Drury v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
Ba ba ba, bye BabybelFromageries Bel v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (December 2019)Fact of the day: I don’t like cheese (you could say I’m not fondue it). [read post]
