Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 10,567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
We can't let history repeat itself. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:28 pm
Maybe they just don’t get along. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:16 am
Robert Menendez (N.J.) [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:13 am
West Virginia you don’t [Ilya Shapiro and Devin Watkins on Cato amicus brief in Felkner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:08 pm
To compound matters, he then asks what her religion is. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
You won’t find the answer here. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:47 am
The Washington Post reports that the FBI reviewed National Security Advisor Michael T. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:58 am
The federal court that was confronted with the issue took swift note about the origins of the religion and ruled that it wasn’t enough to satisfy the legal requirements: This is not a question of theology: it is a matter of basic reading comprehension. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Rockland County Supreme Court Justice Robert M. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 2:29 pm
CJ John Roberts will administer the oath. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:46 am
“It doesn’t seem to me to advance the argument,” Roberts said. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:03 am
” Thus, the opinion concludes, the charter does nothing more than “permi[t] suit in any state or federal court already endowed with subject-matter jurisdiction over the suit. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:12 am
For one thing, he was preoccupied with the jurisdictional implications of the matter. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 12:00 pm
Eventually the advice of professional law of armed conflict lawyers in the U.S. government prevailed, concluding that, as a matter of law, although the GPW applied to these post 9/11 detainees when it came to determining their legal status, they failed to qualify as “privileged” belligerents/POWs. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Ben and Susan also examined why the allegations spelled out in the memos are being taken seriously even though they haven’t been substantiated. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
Glenn, a 2004 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case: William T. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
It will be a distraction, no matter what happens. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:58 am
"Said Robert F. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:16 am
” Katyal argued that this is a matter of state law and prerogative, and that federal law should have nothing to say on the matter. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
The federal conflict-of-interest statute doesn’t apply to the president. [read post]
