Search for: "PFIZER"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 4,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
The application (Pfizer v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 6:59 am
According to SCOTUSblog, Pfizer filed an emergency plea with the Supreme Court yesterday, asking the Court to delay the effect of the Federal Circuit's rulings against Pfizer in the Norvasc case. [read post]
31 May 2007, 6:45 pm
Lyle Denniston is reporting: At "SCOTUSblog," he has posts titled "Pfizer seeks swift patent protection" and "Circuit Court allows war crimes trials to begin. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:13 pm
The application (Pfizer v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2007 WL 1228784, at *3 (S.D. [read post]
30 May 2007, 7:06 pm
Wegner speaks of CAFC overreaction, including DyStar, and describes the decision in Pfizer v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 3:42 am
(formerly known as TorPharm, Inc.) (05/21/2007) (order): Appellee (Pfizer) filed petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc and Appellant (Apotex) filed response; poll requested (whether or not to rehear the appeal en banc), taken, and denied, and Appellant moved for expedited denial of rehearing and rehearing en banc and for expedited issuance of mandate; petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc denied, and motion for expedited denial of rehearing and rehearing en banc denied… [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:42 pm
Of the NAS/STEP report on patent reform, seehttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/05/mark-up-on-patent-reform-act-of-2007.html**Separately,of the denial of rehearing in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 9:52 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- On Monday, the Federal Circuit denied a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc filed by Plaintiff-Appellee Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
22 May 2007, 7:10 pm
Don Zuhn covers the CAFC's denial of en banc review in Pfizer v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:44 pm
See Pfizer v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:31 pm
Pfizer appealed the CAFC obviousness invalidation of 4,879,303 (see The Salt of Obviousness), asking for an en banc review. [read post]
22 May 2007, 12:22 pm
Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:30 am
Federal Circuit's ruling that claims 1 through 3 of Pfizer's patent for the high blood pressure drug Norvasc are invalid for obviousness fails to raise the blood pressure of the requisite number of that court's judges needed to obtain rehearing en banc: Over the dissenting opinions of three judges, the Federal Circuit yesterday issued this order denying rehearing en banc in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:26 pm
Pfizer v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:33 pm
Teva, No. 04-4473 (D.N.J. 2007) More drama involving amlodipine--this time with Lotrel (made by Novartis), rather than Norvasc (made by Pfizer). [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:43 am
AP reports that the Phillippines government has petitioned to void Pfizer's Norvasc patent there. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:09 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2004 WL 2191804, at *6 (S.D. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:34 am
Pfizer has not disclosed how many Provera lawsuits it has pending. [read post]
15 May 2007, 10:13 pm
" Like many other companies, Pfizer will instead move to a consultative selling approach built around providing more value to doctors. [read post]
