Search for: "People v Thomas" Results 4381 - 4400 of 5,935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 9:49 am by Buce
Kudos to Mark Thoma for his injection of a bracing note of clarity into the debate over what we get v. what we pay in "social welfare" taxes. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
Marshall’s most famous decision — Marbury v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:45 am by Steve Lash
“It’s family-involved, it’s kids-involved, it’s religion-involved, it’s best friends-involved,” said Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am by Adam Chandler
” The Washington Post reports that in the wake of District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:50 pm by Tung Yin
 My buddy and I were Justice Kennedy, and one of the cases that I opted to write an opinion in was United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am by PaulKostro
Thomas, 660 F.2d 680, 686 (5th Cir. 1981); Puricelli v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:17 pm by Katie Smith, ACLU
After 2008's 8th Circuit Court decision in Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:47 pm by Tung Yin
 Perhaps not, considering that Branstad said recently, "What the people of Iowa want is an opportunity to vote on marriage defined as one man and one woman. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:46 pm by Tung Yin
 Perhaps not, considering that Branstad said recently, "What the people of Iowa want is an opportunity to vote on marriage defined as one man and one woman. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:05 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
- Gideon Kanner clues us in to a recent opinion in Florida Dep't of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:01 pm by Ilya Somin
Orin claims that this is is inconsistent with the “words” of Supreme Court precedent, citing a dissent by Justice Thomas in Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm by David Kopel
The states did not argue that the revisions to the Medicaid grant program violate the 4-factor test in S.D. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:30 pm by Sandy Levinson
" Marshall was correct in McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:29 am by SHG
Suffolk County Supreme Court Justice Thomas F. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
"* See The Constitution of the United States of America, U.S.G.P.O., Page 1035, Footnote 2.** Cooper v Aaron, 358 US 1, 18-19, [1958]. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:34 am by Transplanted Lawyer
But it was odd to hear him castigate or lionize historical decisions in apparently direct opposition to the traditional view of the liberal academy -- he offered a full-throated defense of Bowers v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Those attending a shareholder proposal meeting on behalf of management are unlikely to be the same people negotiating with the union. [read post]