Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 4381 - 4400 of 5,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2011, 8:15 am
According to People magazine, Springfield's blood alcohol content was measured at .10, over the .08 limit in California. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s fine for a book, but we’ve seen stock crashes triggered by bot v. bot, and that is a problem. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Under consumer protection law, you can’t take back promises you made in the body of the ad in the fine print. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am by Kara OBrien
Recently, Norm Champ, the SEC’s Deputy Director of its Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE), told an audience of registrants that “in general, things go better when people disclose. . . and tell the SEC about a problem. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 9:56 am by A
You know that fine print no one wants to read? [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm by LindaMBeale
  AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am by GuestPost
You were either fined, tortured, executed or some combination of the three. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am by Keith Lee
In the matter of Paper v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
Posted by Ted Gianaris April 23, 2011 Ventura County, California sheriff deputies have discovered that hundreds of people may have been wrongly convicted of driving under the influence since January 2011 as a result of a type of suspected faulty breathalyzer called the Alco-Sensor V, a handheld testing device made by a St. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
Posted by Ted Gianaris April 23, 2011 Ventura County, California sheriff deputies have discovered that hundreds of people may have been wrongly convicted of driving under the influence since January 2011 as a result of a type of suspected faulty breathalyzer called the Alco-Sensor V, a handheld testing device made by a St. [read post]