Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 4381 - 4400 of 7,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2018, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Adams, when the labored arguments of Paterson and Peters, of Iredell, Addison and Chase, are no longer remembered. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
(IP Tango) (IP Watch) (China Hearsay) (IP Tango) CAFC to look at admissibility of new evidence for BPAI appeals: Hyatt v Kappos (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Patently-O) (Patently-O)   Global Global - General Developing IP in countries with weak IPR’s...? [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
(IP Tango) (IP Watch) (China Hearsay) (IP Tango) CAFC to look at admissibility of new evidence for BPAI appeals: Hyatt v Kappos (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Patently-O) (Patently-O)   Global Global - General Developing IP in countries with weak IPR’s...? [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
WM Wrigley (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Domestic use of foreign product manufactured using patented method is not an act of infringement: Input/Output, Inc. et al v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office)   China Get involved in Chinese IP policy… [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Laing LJ and  Peter Jackson LJ agreed, upheld the conclusion that the legislative scheme requires the Commissioner to receive and consider a complaint and then provides the Commissioner with a broad discretion as to whether to conduct a further investigation and, if so, to what extent [80]. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2023, judgment was handed down in Bukhari v Bukhari [2023] EWHC 427 (KB) by Steyn J. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
The Stanford Law Review has an interesting series of articles on privacy in its most recent edition: A Reasonableness Approach to Searches After the Jones GPS Tracking Case by Peter Swire In the oral argument this fall in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:10 pm
"We think the judge's interpretation of the law is in error," Kumpf's attorney Peter Rogers said Thursday. [read post]