Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 55,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2023, 12:38 pm
Dette vil være tilfelle ved dypdykk i de fleste tema. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:00 am
“We are brought irresistibly to the conclusion,” said the majority in Eisner v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 7:43 am
In this case, Aries Construction Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Here, the evidence showed that numerous air‑powered rifles constituted “firearms”, including air-powered devices like paintball guns, even though they could not perforate the wall of a typical residence. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 3:21 am
MexicoPetitioner v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm
See Gantler v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:37 pm
In Twitter v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
Congress gives a private organization the power to propose rules for the horseracing industry with a limited role for the FTC to reject them. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Proponents of adhering strictly to classic (or “absolute”) neutrality rules, such as those outlined in the 1907 Hague Conventions V and XIII Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land and in Naval War, argue that certain types of support violates neutral States’ legal obligations of abstention (or non-participation) and impartiality and thereby constitute a breach of international law. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
That ruling--and especially the opinion of then-Court President Aharon Barak--has sometimes been called the Marbury v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:38 am
In fact, at the time of this writing, the CJEU has only accepted two appeals for review, one of them being a design case (C-382/21 P, EUIPO v KaiKai, ECLI:EU:C:2021:1050).Consequently, and also given that finding validity of a design and, more particularly, assessing the overall impression of two conflicting designs (Article 6 [1] CDR) is a question of fact falling, in general, within the General Court’s exclusive jurisdiction (Joined Cases C-101/11 P and C-102/11 P, Neuman,… [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
B.S.G. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:55 am
So, Texas v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
However, such powers are inconsistent with both international human rights law and recent constitutional law precedent in India. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
County of Mono v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:47 pm
Most law students will know his name from the seminal case of Buckley v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:18 pm
In June, in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
In the legal system, as in so many other aspects of our world, the COVID-19 pandemic was a powerful accelerant of certain trends already in motion. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:02 pm
Most recently, in California v. [read post]
