Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 4381 - 4400 of 14,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
” Delaware Chancery Court Dissolves Failing Limited Partnership Based on General Partner’s Non-Cooperation with Receivers In GMF ELCM Fund, L.P. v ELCM HCRE GP LLC, C.A. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
Senior Judge Hagel of the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims – an Article I Federal Appellate Court – compares attorneys to greedy bottom-feeders in his dissenting poem in Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
Senior Judge Hagel of the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims – an Article I Federal Appellate Court – compares attorneys to greedy bottom-feeders in his dissenting poem in Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
Senior Judge Hagel of the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims – an Article I Federal Appellate Court – compares attorneys to greedy bottom-feeders in his dissenting poem in Young v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm by Caleb Skeath and B.J. Altvater
Finally, the SHIELD Act provides the New York Attorney General more time to bring an action for violations of the statute’s breach notification requirements, while also increasing the total amount of civil penalties available. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Instead, in the context of a legal malpractice action, the continuous representation doctrine tolls the Statute of Limitations only where the continuing representation pertains specifically to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice” (Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 167-68 [2001] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 12:48 pm by Donald B. Verrilli
Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben arguing in Carpenter v. [read post]
Attorney General, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may enter into an executive agreement with another country if the Attorney General finds that the other country’s domestic law “affords robust substantive and procedural protections for privacy and civil liberties in light of the data collection and activities of the foreign government that will be subject to the agreement” based on factors listed in the CLOUD Act. (18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]