Search for: "Register of Copyrights"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 12,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2017, 7:58 am
There is no charge for registering or attending these events. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 10:11 am
Register here. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
"The Board therefore showed who's boss by pulling the plug on this unsound opposition.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:16 pm
” Copyright: kennykiernanillustration / 123RF Stock PhotoThe band’s founder, Simon Tam, said the point of the band’s name is just the opposite. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
It was convinced by the "clear evidence" of the public's understanding of "beadchip" as generic for the genus of Applicant's goods.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 5:05 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark SURE CODE for "printers, namely high resolution printers" ["CODE" disclaimed], finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the mark SUREPRINT, registered for "computer programs to control printers. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:51 am
The Board affirmed this genericness refusal to register, on the Supplemental Register, the designation DIGITAL RF for various communication devices, finding that "digital RF" is broadly used to identify radio transmitting and receiving equipment that can convert digital signals to analog and vice versa. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:07 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Because the PTO failed to establish that the goods are related for Section 2(d) purposes, and because the relevant purchasers will exercise a high degree of care, the Board reversed a refusal to register the mark QUAANTUM for "trailer suspension systems, incorporating wheel end systems," finding it not likely to cause confusion with the registered mark QUANTUM for tires. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:57 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are BODY FRUIT and FRUIT OF THE LOOM Confusingly Similar for Clothing?
25 May 2012, 5:31 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:20 am
But so far, this Applicant has survived on that slippery slope.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark FOR EVERY WALK OF LIFE THERE IS ALWAYS ONE for various clothing items, finding it likely to cause confusion with the registered mark FOR EVERY WALK IN LIFE for some of the same clothing items. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:01 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:29 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:41 am
"TTABlog comment: There was no dis-sent.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
But I'm not going to wine about it.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:18 am
Although it rejected Applicant Schwabe's appeal brief as not brief enough, the Board nonetheless reversed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark EPs 7630 for "plant-based pharmaceuticals for the treatment of respiratory diseases, namely, those based on an ethanolic extract of the roots of pelargonium sidoides," finding it not likely to cause confusion with the registered marks EP and EP 12.5 for "pharmaceutical bronchodilators" [12.5 disclaimed]. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 pm
Third-party registrations and website evidence convinced the Board that Applicant's safety eyewear and goggles are related to binoculars for Section 2(d) purposes, leading to an affirmance of the PTO's refusal to register the mark SEAHAWK for the former in view of the identical mark registered for the latter. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:30 am
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
