Search for: "Samuels" Results 4381 - 4400 of 14,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
”– Justice Samuel Alito Concurring with the majority opinion in Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:58 pm by Tim Zubizarreta
In a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito, the majority rejected the availability of punitive damages in unseaworthiness claims. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
Also in the VIP section are Martha-Ann Alito, the wife of Justice Samuel Alito, and Joanna Breyer, the wife of Justice Stephen Breyer. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:45 am by Megan Robinson
The post Donor Advised Funds – SYK Attorney Featured in Portland Business Journal appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:28 am by Erin Scharff
In a concurrence, Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch, attempts to clarify that the narrowness of this holding does not mean there is no governing standard. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by Miriam Seifter
The majority opinion in Knick, written by Chief Justice John Roberts on behalf of himself and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, overrules Williamson County. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:38 am by SHG
Flowers’s trial and subsequent retrials caused even Justice Samuel Alito, who has long been skeptical of capital defendants, to join the majority opinion and show some sympathy for Mr. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 4:16 pm by Evan Lee
” In a vehement dissent, Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, protested that the decision will lead to a flood of challenges by people currently incarcerated under Section 922(g), most of them in the felon-in-possession category. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Samuel Alito has a concurring opinion, and Thomas has a dissent, joined in part by Justice Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:19 pm by Travis Weber
The court’s opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, refused to apply it, and the dissenters never tried to attack this memorial under the test either. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:42 am by Amy Howe
The court’s opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh and joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, depicted Flowers’ case as one that broke “no new legal ground. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:26 am by K. Hollyn Hollman
Instead, the majority decision, written by Justice Samuel Alito, relies heavily on the longstanding nature of the memorial to uphold its constitutionality. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:54 am by Christopher Walker
But four justices — Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — were willing and ready to answer the question presented now. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:27 am by Michael Stokes Paulsen
The careful majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito made an almost astonishing amount of sense, wrestling thoughtfully with the issues and producing a coherent, unifying rationale for a five-vote majority opinion comprising a diverse ideological center of the court (Alito, plus Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Brett Kavanaugh and Elena Kagan). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” Justice Samuel Alito concurred in the judgment only, but indicated that if “a majority of this Court were willing to reconsider the approach we have taken for the past 84 years, I would support that effort. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
While the critique of excessive delegation did not carry the day this time (the vote was 4-3-1 with Justice Brett Kavanaugh not participating), Justice Samuel Alito indicated that he would be inclined to look at the issue in a future case, and Kavanaugh is thought (from his D.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 7:32 pm by Mila Sohoni
Justice Samuel Alito concurred in the judgment only, which both deprived Kagan of a majority and prevented a 4-4 per curiam affirmance. [read post]