Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 4,537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 6:14 am
Estates, Ltd. v Town of Brookhaven, 2007 NY Slip Op 09583. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 11:43 am
By Katie Caswell In Rose v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 10:42 am
The way it looks right now, Ohio State will finish the regular season ranked Number 1 and there will be great dissension about the team that Ohio State should play. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Bush v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:17 am
Most articles depict the case as either a cash grab or a blip on Facebook’s march to global domination. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 10:48 pm
Yet in a highly urbanized country in which cities and large metropolitan areas dominate the national economy, much of the cross-border movement of persons, goods, and capital inside the United States is more accurately characterized as inter-municipal rather than inter-state. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 1:41 pm
He case is Green v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
The global fashion industry sells more than $750 billion of apparel annually.[1] Major fashion design firms, such as Gucci, Prada, Armani, Ralph Lauren, and Chanel, produce new apparel designs continually, but market their design output via collections introduced seasonally in a series of runway shows.[2] While it is true that trends are constantly in flux, there is always a specific trend each season which dominates the runway and retail stores. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 12:18 pm
Chinese anti-monopoly law ("AML") was enacted on August 30, 2007, which is the first comprehensive competition law in China's history. [1] The Chinese AML was drafted within the context of three principal competition concerns: regional monopolies (local protection); sectoral monopolies by Chinese firms, including state-owned enterprises (administrative monopoly); and a perception of alleged abuses of dominant positions by some multinationals.[2] Even though the EU… [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 6:15 pm
However, now they hesitate to lend to the later starters since there seems to be higher risk of non-payment and, therefore, the later starters only get satellites themselves and related rights and licenses.[23] Obviously, the telecommunication industry or satellite related industries are dominated by big companies which are able to afford those risks or convince financiers to lend to them. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:59 am
… Via john v burke, with thanks. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
Vitale, prohibiting school prayer, Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:36 am
Stateat Miami (Fla.)+ 1221-2419-16LWin overtimeIowa at Northwestern+ 127-2128-17WWthreeinterceptionsWake Forestat Virginia- 1 1/221-2416-17WWViriginia again1-point victorBall Stateat Indiana+ 6 1/241-4420-38WLHoosiersbowl eligibleClemsonat Duke- 1644-1447-10WW23rd straightACC loss by DukeVanderbiltat Florida+ 1614-3522-49WWHarvinhas big dayNebraskaat Kansas+ 17 1/228-2739-76LLMost points everagainst HuskersKansas Stateat Iowa State- 1421-1720-31LWK-State loses but… [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
Roe v Wade's trimester is one good example, and its stability became an open question after years of apparent precedential force. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
As the courtroom saga unfolds, M&A players and practitioners should keep a watchful eye – not since In re IBP Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
Sachs Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Until the appellate courts see fit to revisit the issue, it is likely to remain the dominant theory in Connecticut state courts and at the CHRO. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in 2005 upended the federal sentencing guidelines in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
The decision will have implications for "any company that has a dominant position protected by a proprietary interoperability model between platforms where competitors exist. [read post]
