Search for: "State v. House" Results 4381 - 4400 of 28,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2013, 10:10 pm by Ben Vernia
On August 28, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, in US ex rel Newell v City of St Paul affirmed the district court’s dismissal under the public disclosure bar. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
(The House of Lords has had cause to address earlier iterations of this offence, but through the prism of whether the local authority had complied with its duty to arrange suitable transport to school where necessary: see, for example, Devon CC v George [1989] AC 573.) [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm by Giles Peaker
Williams v Parmar & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2021) UKUT 244 (LC) We knew that the Upper Tribunal has been itching to get an appeal on the approach to the assessment of the amount of a rent repayment order, ever since Ficcara v James, apparently being keen to make the point that ‘the full rent’ was not a starting point in the criminal sentencing sense, as it could not go up beyond that according to landlord conduct. [read post]
4 Dec 0001, 4:00 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
He next shows up at the February 6, 1989 San Bernardino Mayor and Common Council Meeting (from the minutes:) PUBLIC COMMENTS – THE SWORD A citizen, identifying himself as the Anti-Christ, also known as the Sword, Commander-in-Chief of the House of Ying during the battle of Armageddon, stated that the taping of all meetings of the Mayor and Common Council is [sic] required to be announced according to the Supreme Court decision of Davis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Christine Bartholomew
David Rapallo, House Rules: Congress and the Attorney-Client Privilege, 100 Wash. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Burglary, defined to be the act of breaking into and entering the house of another in the night time with intent to commit a felony therein. 9. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:26 am by VALL Blog Master
  [1] Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 11:50 am by Giles Peaker
This would be ‘manifestly without reasonable foundation’, following R (Turley) v Wandsworth LBC (2017) EWCA Civ 189, (2017) HLR 21 and R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2019) UKSC 21. [read post]