Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 4381 - 4400 of 6,784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
Vigil's testimony which was not identified by the State until after the 404(b) hearing. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
State, an Oct. 15th NFP opinion by Judge Darden, quotes from a decision of "another panel of this Court" on p. 11, Hunter v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm by Anthony Zaller
  The California Supreme Court recognized this in Dynamex, stating: As the United States Supreme Court observed in Board v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:32 am by Jon
" (p. 55) In essence, he Constitution requires that states have a choice about whether to participate in the expansion of eligibility; if they decide not to, they can continue to receive funds for the rest of the program. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
"[B]efore proceeding to discovery, a complaint must allege facts suggestive of illegal conduct. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
One tailored to the particular case must be found, and that can be done only after a discriminating consideration of all information bearing upon an enlightened prediction of the future’ ” (Amodio v Amodio, 70 NY2d 5, 7, quoting Snyder’s Estate v United States, 285 F2d 857, 861). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm by Robichaud
The presumption of diminished responsibility of youth in murder sentencing under Canadian law and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA): the case of R. v. [read post]