Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 4381 - 4400 of 8,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
 http://katzjustice.com    The United States has been living in wartime since 2001 (earlier than that, many peaceniks might say). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:31 pm by JD Hull
UNITED STATES The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma 1 pauperis is granted. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:29 am by Dennis Crouch
  That said, the courts have not stated directly that waiver of a 12(b)(5) motion counts as service under 315(b). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:05 am by Nora Demleitner
The United States has changed its argument in this line of cases several times. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:18 pm by Nora Demleitner
The United States has changed its argument in this line of cases several times. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
That subsection imposes liability on a party who “supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States all or a substantial portion of the components of a patented invention . . . in such manner as to actively induce the combination of such components outside of the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States” (emphasis added). [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Nelson is binding precedent as to petitioners’ constitutional claims. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
The docket sheet in the United States Supreme Court tells the tale. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" … "A more stringent standard" applies when we evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence of alarm for expressive contacts, because they implicate Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The child was citizen of the United States of America and of the Republic of Argentina. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am by John L. Welch
For purposes of this chapter, a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce-- ... on services when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, orthe services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services. [read post]