Search for: "True the Vote"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 11,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2020, 3:47 am
What does a true Patriot do when his nation’s existence is being threatened? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
The headline is half-true and would be fully true if the words (in a vacuum) were added. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 10:33 pm
I wish it were true (and think it may be true for young voters), but I suspect that most independent voters who cast a ballot for Obama voted for competence, not for a comprehensive progressive philosophy. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 11:39 am
And please keep voting. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:50 am
Constitution requiring a two-thirds vote in the Senate after a majority vote in the House. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
African-Americans are overwhelmingly likely to support Democratic candidates, and whites are more likely to vote Republican. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:37 am
Magid was a significant step forward from prior appellate law on the subject of deadlock under Section 63, the most recent of which, Seligson v Russo, 16 AD3d 253 [1st Dept 2005], involved true “50-50 deadlock. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:41 am
This was true, for example, when Roberts replaced Rehnquist, Alito replaced O’Connor, Sotomayor replaced Souter, and Kagan replaced Stevens. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
It is true that there was not much movement in the House to contemplate a second impeachment of Trump until his words helped spur a deadly mob to storm the Capitol to prevent the counting of electoral votes. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:48 pm
But once you take the leap and recognize the basic doctrine of third party consent, it becomes very hard to say that there is a set of circumstances in which that is not true. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
The same is true, and more so, when we argue to executive officials and legislators that it would be good policy to provide publicly funded counsel in selected civil matters. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Both in and out of court, she made wild and demonstrably false claims.Some of those claims concerned Dominion Voting Systems, a Denver-based corporation that makes machines that count paper ballots. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
It did so by releasing (by 3/2 vote) an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) – the first step in a Mag-Moss rulemaking – and holding a press conference featuring Chair Khan, Commissioners Slaughter and Bedoya, and senior FTC staff. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
Most of the time much of this is true enough--though such resolutions are critically important in developing a sense of the flows of power among factions of states as they seek to capture the control of the narrative of international discourse and more importantly the consequences of that discourse for law and norm making that can then be imposed on (or serve as an excuse for such imposition in bilateral relations) others. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In addition to trying to suppress non-Republican votes, however, these legislators can also change their states’ laws in ways that will make it legal to override the voters in their states in future presidential elections.For example, a state could adopt a new law that would empower the legislative leaders of both houses to “investigate” claims of voter fraud and, if they just so happen to find anything suspicious, appoint electors based on what they think the… [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
It would be tempting to say that a sufficiently large turnout of Democrats in 2022 and 2024 could do the trick, but that is true only if one assumes that Republicans have not already made it possible to exclude from the final counts as many votes as needed for them to install their candidates in office. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
As it happens, my colleague John Golden and I are writing a paper together in which we offer a critique of the notion of states as “laboratories of experimentation,” which, even if true and justifying federalism per se, would still not justify equal voting power in the Senate. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
" While true, this statement does not necessarily require equating the rights of corporations and unions to enage in dialogue about political candidates with those of people who actually vote for them.Further, although the Supreme Court has considered money a form of protected speech, money does not persuade like mere words. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 7:26 pm
Section 316(b) no longer does much work, even as it prevents bondholders and bond issuers from realizing their preferences regarding modes of restructuring and voting rules. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:44 am
It only takes 50% of the vote to ratify a dealâ€â [read post]
