Search for: "True v. United States" Results 4381 - 4400 of 9,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2006, 12:39 pm
An example would be a manufacturer who represented that his products were made in the United States by companies that employ only union labor, whereas in fact they were made in Third World sweatshops. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Upon sentencing, the court shall forward to the Division of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse's Intoxicated Driving Program Unit a copy of a person's conviction record. [read post]
5 May 2010, 2:17 pm by Gabriel Eber, National Prison Project
A legal resident of the United States who fled civil war in El Salvador at age 10, Castañeda was placed in a San Diego immigration detention facility in 2006 after serving a four-month state sentence for a drug conviction. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
IBWA is a nonprofit whose members are bottled water producers, distributors, and suppliers in the United States and abroad. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the  rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:02 am by Jack Chin
United States case the Court decided last year. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
However, as the United States District Court for the Central District of California pointed out in Gaprindashvili v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm by Eva Lopez
He fled to the United States seeking asylum after being abducted and tortured by government agents. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am by Marty Lederman
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (internal citation omitted); see also NFIB, 567 U.S. at 562 (Opinion of Roberts, C.J.). [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
 What is more, the Leegin Court made clear that administrative convenience—part of the justification for administrative rules[30]—cannot in and of itself be sufficient to justify application of the per se rule.[31] The Court’s warnings about per se rules ring just as true for rules that could be promulgated under the Commission’s purported UMC rulemaking authority, which would function just as a per se rule would. [read post]