Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 9,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
Notwithstanding Warrant 2's Rule 41 defect, the Government urges us to reverse the district court's order granting Krueger's motion to suppress, because, according to the Government, the district court applied the wrong legal standard in determining that Krueger demonstrated prejudice as a result of the Rule violation.For the reasons outlined below, we disagree.U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Colon is, however, ambiguous as to the level of discretion afforded to police officers by the impugned Dutch provision and it was decided on the narrow issue of whether the Convention requires prior judicial authorisation for such powers. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:19 am
Recently, in Forman v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
(Citing Garcia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:37 pm
By Jason Rantanen Wi-Lan, Inc v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
The new case is Welch v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Blake v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
On a more domestic-law level, the much-publicised case of R (on the application of Evans) and another v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21 (Case Comment here) concerned the ten-year battle for the public disclosure of [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
K.C. and V.C. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
While courts do not require `heightened fact pleading of specifics,” a plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to “raise a right to relief above the speculative level. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am
In the meantime, nothing is going to make me nervous.Not too long ago I honestly did believe that history would, at a higher level, repeat itself, with Android doing to the iPhone what Windows did to the original Mac. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:54 am
” The challenge to the Texas health-and-safety regulations of abortion providers in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
Tomlinson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am
The affirmative action plan used by the University of Texas has been under intense scrutiny in the past few days following the hearing of Fisher v University of Texas II. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Hunter v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:29 am
Most interesting ERISA decision that flew under the radar: Osberg v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
Meanwhile in the UK the ISPs’ appeal to the Court of Appeal in Cartier v BSkyB (three judgments here, here and here) is pending. [read post]
