Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 13,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 11:16 am
United Fabricare Supply, Inc. v. 3Hanger Supply Company, Inc., 2012 WL 2449916 (C.D. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
In Cullen v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Even more so given that the overwhelming majority of criminal cases end with plea bargains.The California Supreme Court decides the issue. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:45 am
The project architect stated that the air conditioners selected by BH were noisier than indoor units but were also less expensive. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:28 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of WashingtonOpinion Date: 12/17/10Cite: Edifecs Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:41 pm
United States Gypsum Company, which held that no evidence of a same-sex harasser's homosexuality is required. [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:00 am
A big case was argued this week before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 7:03 am
On August 5, 2024, in United States ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:28 am
Under Thornburg v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
” In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 12:12 pm
Pa. v.] [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
In the United States, however, constitutional adjudication does not work that way. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:08 pm
In California, intrastate sale of raw milk and raw colostrum is legal and regulated. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:11 pm
As I predicted, the United States Supreme Court denied Domino’s Petition for Certiorari today. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
Motorola in Seattle and its affirmance by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (this circuit also includes California), San Jose-based Senior District Judge Ronald Whyte granted a preliminary injunction based on a summary judgment finding in RealTek's favor on Realtek's allegation that LSI and Agere breached their FRAND licensing obligation by seeking an ITC exclusion order without previously offering a license on FRAND terms.This is the first time for… [read post]
