Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 6,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
But in 2002, the voters in the bluest of blue states elected Linda Lingle as the first Republican governor since Bill Quinn got caught up in the Democratic wave in 1962. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For example, in the famous and controversial case of Rust v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:37 am
Just a few examples: Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 5:44 am
The first case, City of Riverside v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
The lawsuit, Sevick v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:56 am
And, SCOTUSBlog sums up the main questions presented to the Court in the various petitions: The five main questions are: (1) whether a one-line decision by the Court, in the 1972 case of Baker v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am
In the other case, another Sixth Circuit panel held that Ohio’s contraction of the early voting period to exclude the weekend before the election, for all voters except certain military voters, violated the equal protection clause under Bush v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:29 am
However, in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:19 am
People v Urziceanu (2005) 132 CA4th 747, 773, 33 CR3d 859. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:59 pm
In fact, they had an incentive to do worse than work hard; to do the wrong thing: Republican bosses got caught putting pressure on appellate judges to change their ruling (in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:20 pm
V, section 10.) [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 1:25 pm
They no doubt aim here at the reliance by federal courts upon Romer v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:57 am
Appellate Judges: I was amazed that New York voters dumped three appellate judges. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:57 am
Appellate Judges: I was amazed that New York voters dumped three appellate judges. [read post]
