Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 10,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Agudelo v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Kihuen, Dan Kildee, Carolyn B. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Kihuen, Dan Kildee, Carolyn B. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
`(C) PROCEDURES FOR GRANTING EXCEPTION-`(i) BURDEN OF PROOF- A party seeking an exception under subparagraph (A) has the burden of demonstrating that it meets the requirements of such subparagraph. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:57 am
§ 65-3.5(b)). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
§ 1396p(b)(4); and (2) if not, whether 42 U.S.C. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
What d ya say I. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
LEWIS C. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:14 am
See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 55(b). [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm
If the petitioner says his lawyer was ineffective for reasons A, B, and C, and the district court says A and B were fine but C was ineffective, does he need a COA for A and B? [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
Offshore Group Investment Limited d/b/a Vantage Drilling International, Vantage Deepwater Drilling, Inc., and Vantage Energy Services, Inc.; In the 133rd District Court of Harris County, Texas; Hon. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
"That jurisdiction includes all cases of every description in law and equity, from the most important and complicated to the most simple and insignificant" (Nestor v McDowell, 81 NY2d 410, 415 [1993], quoting Maresca v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 242 [1984]; De Hart v Hatch, 3 Hun 375, 380), and includes any new classes of actions or proceedings that the Legislature may create (see NY Const, art VI, § 7 [b]; Kagen v 193 Misc.2d 435] Kagen, 21… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:26 am
Section 230(c)(1) of Title 47 of the U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
BILL McCOLLUM, etc., ET AL., Petitioners, C:! [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
” Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(b) through (d) include four exceptions to these novelty parts. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm
Van Breda, providing primary emphasis to the parties connection to the jurisdiction for a real and substantial connection, (a) the defendant is domiciled or resident in the province; (b) the defendant carries on business in the province; (c) the tort was committed in the province; and (d) a contract connected with the dispute was made in the province. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:52 pm
” d. [read post]
