Search for: "B. Smith" Results 4401 - 4420 of 5,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
By contrast, Judge Smith in dissent, while not using that analogy exactly, gets the point across:"The right of confrontation includes -- indeed, is, at its core -- the right to meet one's accuser face to face (Coy v Iowa, 487 US 1012, 1016 [1988]). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:44 am by Susan Brenner
The Supreme Court noted that “[b]ecause Smith does not concede here that a cell phone is analogous to a closed container, the analysis in Finley is not entirely applicable” in the Smith case. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm by MacIsaac
Justice Smith succinctly summarized the law relating to breach of insurance for principal operation misrepresentation as follows: [5] Section 19(1)(b) and (e) of the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Smith Hoffman, Peremptory Challenges Should Be Abolished, 64 U. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:00 pm
A corollary may well be that one becomes a professor of (a) sociology; (b) psychology, (c) economics; (d) law, precisely because one does not have a knack for those things that make up the common-sense parts of the discipline. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:36 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
Leeds, Grenville and Lanark District Health Unit, 2009 ONCA 685 (CanLII), the court upheld convictions against the operator of a Smith Falls sports bar who tried to operate the place as a private club. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm by Jon Sands
The dissent was by Kozinski (joined b y Rymer and Kleinfeld). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:38 pm by Jon Sands
Smith) held that the California special circumstance statute that triggered a LWOP sentence was not unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
" The 112 count indictment unsealed in Cayuga County Supreme Court today charges 21 people with crimes including various Criminal Sale and Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance (class A,B,C,D felonies) and Conspiracy in the second degree (class B felony). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Reference from Irish Supreme Court to ECJ: Same Proceedings Pending in a non European State I am grateful to Michelle Smith de Bruin BL for... [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
The case of Smith v Smith [2009] EWCA Civ 1297, reported today, is of considerable interest. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
There are all these random scrawlings on the board--a partial case name, a giant "B" with an arrow that goes to a couple of dollar signs, a big "SCALIA" with a bunch of question marks next to it, etc. etc. [read post]