Search for: "Body v. Body" Results 4401 - 4420 of 21,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
City of Montebello declared invalid administrative QME Regulation 35.5(e), which says, “In the event a new injury or illness is claimed involving the same type of body part or body system and the parties are the same, or in the event either party objects to any new medical issue within the evaluator's scope of practice and clinical competence, the parties shall utilize to the extent possible the same evaluator who reported previously. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm
” The language comes from the case of Grutter v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
We start the new year with a religious discrimination case in which the Court of Appeals finds that a village in Rockland County discriminated against a Jewish organization by passing zoning laws that thwarted the organizations plans for a development that would include a housing complex.The case is Congregation Rabbinical College of Tarticov v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:04 pm by David Oscar Markus
The justices have wrestled with the question of spiritual advisers at executions for two and a half years, but Tuesday’s oral argument in Ramirez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm by Bryan West
The post Case Review – Ellcar Ventures Ltd. v MacLeod, 2023 BCSC 2095 appeared first on Construction Law Canada. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
  (It's probably a treat for the Board, but that's a fairly amorphous body, not someone with actual feelings.)I'll leave it you the reader to check out the opinion to learn the things that got Ms. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
 In this case we consider how these rules apply to an order requiring a local legislative body, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, to remove and replace one of its members. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:49 am by Danielle Citron
 The constitutional implications of mass quantities of data were at the heart of five Justices’ concurrences in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:59 am by Joy Waltemath
On the other hand, his ADA regarded as claim could proceed to trial, said the court, observing that BNSF readily admitted it refused to hire him based on its fear that he would suddenly develop sleep apnea, diabetes, or heart disease, and as a result might become suddenly and unexpectedly incapacitated while performing his duties (Shell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:33 pm by Monica Williamson
Assist as the lead staff attorney in judicial proceedings and litigation in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
They are expected to grasp and rule on a vast body of law. [read post]