Search for: "Doe v. Brown" Results 4401 - 4420 of 5,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 2:39 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 In the Court’s close division and the strongly worded dissents, Brown echoes other recent Eighth Amendment cases dealing with sentencing, such as Graham v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:33 am by Michael O'Hear
 In the Court’s close division and the strongly worded dissents, Brown echoes other recent Eighth Amendment cases dealing with sentencing, such as Graham v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition CVSG Information:Invited: February 28, 2011Filed: May 26, 2011 (Deny) Title: Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:14 am by admin
 Judge Brown opines that (i) Rule 12(b)(6) does not apply to SOX complaints, but ALJs can use OALJ summary decision procedure (29 C.F.R. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:14 am by Lisa McElroy
But let’s start with one of the week’s major headliners:  Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:50 am by zshapiro
Some Supreme Court decisions are earthshaking (Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Brown, 260 S.W.2d 264, 268 (Tenn. 1953), we are unable to expand the intentional torts exception to include assault and battery. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:11 pm by Venkat
[It appears Expedia heeded the Ninth Circuit's advice from Doe 1 v AOL. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:04 pm by Robert Tanha
In Brown v. 1714717 Ontario Inc., decided April 26, 2011, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found that an employer had wrongfully terminated the applicant employee when it dismissed her without cause, and in reprisal for requesting and taking time off for a vacation.Because the employee in the case had completed less than twelve months of employment at the time she asked for time-off, she was not entitled to take a vacation or receive vacation pay under Part XI of the Ontario… [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:57 am by INFORRM
In the Lord Browne case (Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd 2007) the judge agreed with Associated that knowing that there was a relationship between Lord Browne and Jeff Chevalier was ‘important background in authenticating in readers’ minds the other allegations they [the newspaper] wish to publish’ which were considered to be in the public interest. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:30 am
Supreme Court's order to release tens of thousands of California inmates.That order came Monday, in the Court's 5-to-4 decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:13 pm by Dharmendra Chatur
Does that mean the U.S. should consider more prisons to keep the streets safe, in the light of the Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:05 pm
By Mike Dorf As I discussed yesterday, Monday's Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:21 pm by Michael O'Hear
Ironically, the Times article appears next to an article on the political fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:38 am by Tyler S St Cyr
  Presumably, Biddle is frustrated that groups are not using the courts for education reform, as in the era of Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
Justice Stephens agreed with the dissent that article I, section 22 of our state constitution does not permit the State to suggest the defendant has tailored his testimony when exercising his trial rights. [read post]