Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 5,281
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2010, 11:49 am
The Defendants opposed these applications arguing that the HCCRA does not apply to lawsuits filed before April 1, 2009. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:40 am
§ 207(a)(1). [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm
At 36-37. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:41 pm
For example, 37 C.F.R. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:58 am
See CAFC Says “Patented Invention” Does Not Include Methods for Newman’s vociferous (and “spot on”) dissent in Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:39 am
A Few Caveats 1. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:18 pm
" Does this lyric sound familiar? [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
The “Third Way” Is the Old Way in Drag For the past year, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has been laying the groundwork for imposing “Net Neutrality” regulations on broadband networks and has stepped up this crusade in recent weeks.[1] He has done this despite the D.C. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:00 pm
Applicants may file the documents or fee payments by: (1) Facsimile transmission, (2) first class mail with a certificate of mailing in accordance with 37 CFR 1.8, (3) hand- delivery to the USPTO, or (4) ‘‘Express Mail’’ from USPS in accordance with 37 CFR 1.10. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:56 am
I've always thought that standards such as proportionality and rule of reason could be used as elements to prove intent (e.g., if the measure does not accomplish what it is purported to, this is evidence of protectionist intent), but I don't think that is what is meant here. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:25 am
This observation does not control our decision. [read post]
15 May 2010, 2:22 pm
" 37 C.F.R. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:53 pm
What does this mean? [read post]
13 May 2010, 9:40 am
The comments are open… [update (2010.05.13): Someone asked me "why does it matter? [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:16 am
Applying 37 C.F.R. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am
Now, only if an applicant knowingly makes a false, material representation with the intent to deceive does their action rise to the level of fraud, meriting harsh punishment. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
Private International Law and the Downturn 1. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
The term "foreign experiences" does surface in "For Justice Marshall," 71 Texas Law Review 1125 (1993), Kagan's tribute to her then-just-departed Boss. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Once implemented, this legislation will ensure that the dominant industrial global food system is anointed as the only legitimate manner of food production and distribution, a deception that amounts to a covert continuation of the Enclosure Movement.[1] Just as the Enclosure acts during the 17th through 19th centuries drove peasants off what was once communal land, the food safety legislation will serve to bar small- and medium-sized business people from engaging in food… [read post]
8 May 2010, 7:21 am
37. [read post]
