Search for: "German v. German" Results 4401 - 4420 of 5,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by Cyberleagle
In a few months’ time three years will have passed since the French Constitutional Council struck down the core provisions of the Loi Avia - France’s equivalent of the German NetzDG law – for incompatibility with fundamental rights. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Joseph Landau
  Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Steve Vladeck
After all, unlike their CCA counterparts, CMCR judges are not subject to similar appellate supervision by other Article II officers, and thus may well be “principal officers” whose appointment, under Myers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
However, in some offices, including the Benelux and German offices and OHIM, the practice will be applied on the implementation date retrospectively to all pending applications and proceedings. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
German: it’s only 40% depleted in common terms, but when you account for translational similarity it goes up to 80%. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:59 am by Florence Campbell Jones
SWITZERLAND Reuters reported that Switzerland’s economic growth decelerated in the second quarter of 2019 to 0.3 per cent from a downwardly revised 0.4  per  cent in the previous period. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Warby J heard an application in the case of Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd Green J also heard an application in the case of Smith v Persons Unknown. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Maria Hook
   Facts The defendant, 3A Composites GmbH (3AC), was a German manufacturer of a cladding product installed on the plaintiffs’ buildings. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
District Court for the Southern District of California, Hammock et al. v. [read post]