Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 4,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
(Editor’s Note: This is the second installment of our Ending Perpetual War Symposium. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
All Quiet on the Western Front also continues to be protected in Germany and other countries whose copyright terms last for 70 years after the author’s death, which includes most of the world. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
As I’ve said, there are some countries like Germany, given its history with the Stasi, that are very sensitive to these issues. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
Some E.U. countries, including Germany, are concerned that Lithuania’s enforcement of the sanctions could trigger a dangerous escalation from the Kremlin, in part because it targets commerce between two regions of Russia rather than Russian imports and exports, according to European officials. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
Lots of SSRN articles on arbitration last month. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015)The move toward a global economic order, sitting atop and within the traditional system of states, one grounded on free movement of capital and investment, and constructed through a complex web of inter-state bi-lateral and multi-lateral agreements that have created a network of customary norms, has produced conflict and contradiction. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Session 2: Legal Protection for DesignIntroduction: Chris Sprigman: what kinds of protection should be available depends on what the justifications for protection are. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:42 am
Maui Jim, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am
Supreme Court upheld male-only registration in Rostker v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onComparative Constitutional Design, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am
On the other hand, the opposition division also held that O1's opposition was inadmissible and took a separate "additional decision" to this effect (see above point V). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
W/o harmonization, standards for advertising were different—protection very strict in Germany, 10-15% misled = sufficient for misleading. [read post]
