Search for: "High v State" Results 4401 - 4420 of 35,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 11:10 am by Patrick E. Knie
On Appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court The state’s high court issued a writ of certiorari to review the intermediate appellate court’s determination of the issues. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 11:10 am by Patrick E. Knie
On Appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court The state’s high court issued a writ of certiorari to review the intermediate appellate court’s determination of the issues. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
In its decision yesterday in Minnesota Voters Alliance v Mansky, the Supreme Court ruled that a Minnesota law banning political apparel at polls ran afoul of the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
The issue continues to rise in visibility with new federal court rulings on the topic, notably in Wisconsin (Whitford v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:48 pm by Nathan Koppel
The High Court released four opinions today, including this one in American Electric Power v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:30 pm
  It's an insurance bad faith suit with a high-low baseball arbitration of $500,000/$7.5 million, with the limits undisclosed to the arbitrator. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:15 am by sally
Supreme Court Principal Reporter v K & Ors (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 56 (15 December 2010) Revenue and Customs v DCC Holdings (UK) Ltd [2010] UKSC 58 (15 December 2010) Edwards & Anor, R (on the application of) v Environment Agency & Ors [2010] UKSC 57 (15 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Pluck v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2936 (15 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Friends of Basildon Golf Course, R (on the application of)… [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
   They stated (in Fraser (Nat Gordon) v HM Advocate (No. 2) [2009] HCJAC 27 at paragraph 13 that: “[W]e have come to the conclusion that the appellant’s application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council should be refused as incompetent. [read post]