Search for: "In Re Ades"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 44,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2023, 8:57 am
Generally, ads are merely “solicitations to bargain,” not offers, and so here with the TV and online ads. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:37 am
In this case, it is the platform which benefits from the ads, not the blogger. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
We're getting ripped off! [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:06 am
’” PharmaCann, 123 USPQ2d at 1123 (quoting In re JJ206, LLC, 120 USPQ 1568, 1569 (TTAB 2016) and In re Brown, 119 USPQ2d 1350, 1351 (TTAB 2016)). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:31 am
It’s more than just an ad, but also (in many listings) an endorsement by actual clients. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Hanrahan (In re Meill), #10-6019 (8th Cir. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:59 pm
Last night, all three incumbents on the Texas Supreme Court won re-election rather handily. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
People can interpret ads more than one way and advertisers must substantiate all reasonable interpretations consumers take from their ads. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:30 am
You’re dilly dallying. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:56 pm
” If you’re marketing to everyone, you’re marketing to no one. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Hyperlink reference not valid.; in Chrome, go to chrome://plugins) but they’re much further under the hood. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 3:45 pm
(highlight added)On or about August 30, 2018 the “Fact Sheet” wording was changed to the following:Set a minimum standard of 75 years of copyright term for sound recordings and other works calculated by date of publication, and life plus 70 years for works calculated based on the life of the author. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:16 am
In re Tanaka (CAFC 2011) (here) As a reminder, Ex parte Tanaka was decided in December of 2009 by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:26 am
Here, defendant’s use of Instagram hashtags wasn’t fair use because they’re visible to consumers, unlike keyword ads, and thus “too much” (and also, the court thinks, used to refer to defendant’s product, which doesn’t make very much sense to me, since defendant’s product is for use with plaintiff’s product); likewise, using a picture of plaintiff’s product (which has the plaintiff’s mark on it) isn’t… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:51 am
What hovers over all of this is the potentially pernicious impact of the desire for (re)appointment in many, not least for financial gain, in which not only withholding fr [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:35 am
Dear Rich: I am equestrian artist that will be adding a t-shirt line to my portfolio. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
S4MM used a few lines (of audio) from NPR to try to bolster their case to voters.It's easy to complain when your own side is being abused; it shows real intellectual honesty to stand up for your bitter opponent when they're in the right.Here's the SFMM ad, which was apparently re-posted by someone unknown. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
As a result, Disconnect Mobile blocks these types of ads—even though ad-blocking is incidental to its primary goal. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The present decision confirms this approach:The principle of res judicata[1] The present board agrees with the findings regarding the principle of res judicata set out in T 51/08 [3] in the context of a parent and its divisional application. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
But actually the Beatles do show that warn against making logical fallacies: ("Think of what you're saying, you can get it wrong, and still you think that it's all right. [read post]
