Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones" Results 4401 - 4420 of 6,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 11:14 am by Michael M. O'Hear
 (9-10) I think it is particularly interesting to see the Court breathe new life into the Jones principle that federal statutes should not be interpreted so as to “significantly change[] the federal-state balance in the prosecution of crimes. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Jones, the Court held unconstitutional the warrantless GPS surveillance of a person’s car over a long period of time via a tracking device that police attached to the car. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Jones, in which the Supreme Court ruled that the installation of a GPS tracking device on a suspect’s car, without a warrant, violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
meaning they had more suitable grounds for bringing a claim- the residual rights of Zeta-Jones and Douglas were not sufficient to justify interference in this instance. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand Stuff.nz reports that Sir Robert Jones has discontinued his defamation claim against filmmaker Renae Maihi on the fifth day of the trial at the High Court in Wellington. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 11:36 am by Eugene Volokh
"Ignorance or mistake as to a matter of fact or law is a defense if … the ignorance or mistake negatives the purpose, knowledge, belief, recklessness or negligence required to establish a material element of the offense …. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
The Master of the Rolls: “Yes but if you want us to go into private in order to argue this matter, we can do so. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Camelot Guardian Management Ltd v Khoo (2018) EWHC 2296 (QB) (Not on Bailii for some reason. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am by Walter Shaub
Jones will hold an evidentiary hearing to evaluate Meadows’ filing. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
I consider, therefore, that the only part of the defendant’s submission which warrants serious consideration is the contention that a defendant is entitled to the defence of qualified privilege if he honestly and reasonably believed that the person to whom he published the words complained of had a duty or interest as to the matters referred to in the communication. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 10:31 am by Jillian C. York
For me it’s about recognizing that ideas currently seen as fringe or controversial may be seen as totally mainstream in even a matter of decades. [read post]